Even Your DNA Is a Commodity Now

Exactly what EC have said many times: money did not make us free-er. Over the centuries, the tools for control have just changed and blatantly became more tyrannical as time went by. Monetarism monetizes life, meaning nature and human beings all together, because it inherently offers the incentive to further and expand control. In fact, by accepting this subterfuge, we are the makers of our own enslavement. Servitude by consent that is paradoxically generated by money chasing. This is the Polarity Principle in action.

That’s exactly why “those in the know” were able to get away with it for so long… we are talking of millennia here. They are just banking on the fact that we will never realize the trick, and if we do that we won’t dare stand up for ourselves. Anybody not playing the game ends up homeless or if luckier on some off-the-grid community with a farm and a diesel vehicle running on veggie oil. Let’s admit it: Is this all what life has REALLY to offer?

Now our DNA is the property of a body whose aims are extremely malevolent… remember yesterday blog: Dystopian Human Embryo Gene Editing For New Human Species Is REALLY Here Now!

If you believe the Annunaki hypothesis (beings who came here to mine gold and genetically modified the human species back then) it surely looks like Humanity has just been walking in circles for a very very very long time. A myth? Not so sure.

It definitely sounds as if additional dots are now connected. It is about time to end the “slavery system” and the mindset that regards slavery (exploitation) as a norm, just as Mark Passio explains in this highly compelling and 3hr+ long podcast below.

Mark Passio How Our Ancient Annunaki Origins Can Explain Modern Human Behaviour (no longer available on YT


27 Jul, 2018 | A major DNA-testing Silicon Valley company is partnering with a British pharmaceutical giant, saying its database of over five million hereditary material samples will help develop new medical treatments…. “For those who do consent, their information will be de-identified, so no individual will be identifiable to GSK,” the pharmaceutical said, noting that over 80 percent of 23andMe’s customer base on average consent to participate in research…. FULL ARTICLE https://www.rt.com/news/434393-genomics-startup-data-big-pharma/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

>2015 | Are you aware that when you purchase a DNA kit for genealogy testing through either 23andMe or Ancestry that you are literally giving these companies carte blanche to your DNA, the rights to your DNA information, including for medical utilization meaning sales to Big Pharm, and there is absolutely no opt-out, meaning they can in essence do anything they want with your anonymized data?…. However, opting out of his higher level DOES NOT stop the company from utilizing, sharing or selling your anonymized DNA and data. Anonymized data means your identity and what they consider identifying information has been removed…. MORE: https://dna-explained.com/2015/12/30/23andme-ancestry-and-selling-your-dna-information/

Ancestry.com can use your DNA to target ads (2015) https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2015/09/07/ancestry-com-can-use-your-dna-to-target-ads/

The government owns your DNA. What are they doing with it? (2014) The bad news is that we also may not be aware that many states have created biobanks funded by genetic material left over from our screening tests, and, even more surprising, our specimens may be used for purposes we do not fully understand or for which we have not granted informed consent….  https://www.newsweek.com/2014/08/01/whos-keeping-your-data-safe-dna-banks-261136.html

Ancestry.Com Is Quietly Transforming Itself Into A Medical Research Juggernaut (2015) Sittner sold the company long ago, but three decades after it began, Ancestry.com — the $1.6 billion Internet company that his magazine evolved into — is poised to become one of the most unlikely, yet powerful, scientific tools in the world. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/06/ancestrycom-medical-research-juggernaut_n_7008446.html

Even Your DNA Is a Commodity Now: Genomics Startup Sold 5mn Users’ Genetic Data to Big Pharma

Remember that several years ago, the idea of “genome editing”provoked outcries and even got the support of hundreds of outraged scientists from all over the planet when the birth of Dolly (the sheep) was announced?

It is our view that genome editing is not morally unacceptable in itself. There is no reason to rule it out in principle.”…. The problem is that the technology of gene editing is anything but precise, contrary to what its advocates like Bill Gates may claim. The methodology of manipulating a specific part of a DNA chain to change human embryos is based on flawed scientific reductionism, which ignores the complexity of biophysical reality and of the fundamental laws of nature. (global research link below)

What do they exactly know? What they do know would actually blow our minds!

Although the statement about ignoring the complexity and fundamental laws makes absolutely sense, we should not assume that, in very high spheres, they do not know what they are really doing. They know, because they have been hiding history and the very origins of the human species. This does mean that what do say publicly “those in the know” and “top monetized scientists” has not value at all whatsoever. Max Igan has an excellent podcast explaining the stakes, posted here below just in case you missed it.

One thing is certain though, the gene editing experiment never stopped, during all this time scientists have worked behind close doors. Meanwhile the media worked on changing the population’s perceptions, that genetic manipulation is desirable and beneficial. We shouldn’t credit the opponents too fast because they were very well aware of what was happening.

Remember, there is no such a thing as a healthy competition because the only goal of competition is to end all competition, and in the current environment, one does not need to be a rocket scientist to figure out what this all means. Competition is never ethical because it is coercive.

Unless people begin to stand up for themselves, the human species as we know it could be on its way out, and rather sooner than later because of the powerful technology at their disposal. As much as we do not know how far the gene editing research already is, the full potential of our technology is also hidden from us. Things could be moving swiftly all of a sudden.

Hollywood has already described such a scenario in countless sci-fi movies. It is not far fetched at all anymore that humans will likely be morphed into (new) slaves species, while other engineered species take over.

What we ought to come to term with is the fact that slavery has existed since the dawn of times, and since there are more slaves today that at any time in history, the odds rather seem against us, though the game is not set in stone yet. The Earth Custodians blog has already tackled these daunting issues several times, and unfortunately there is no other way to interpret this UK headline, especially when following the money trail that has concentrated power in the hands of the very few.

The AI advance has largely benefited from transhumanism’s promise of “eternity”

There isn’t any rosy AI nor scientific paradigm out there awaiting us around the corner. The masses are being conditioned that it is for their own good and give their consent away because they have been taught that competition always benefits the whole, even if some are “sacrificed” in the process. Which is completely untrue because by supporting competition, one always stands the risk to be oneself erased. Nobody with a sane mind would support competition nor being treated as a commodity.

The technology itself is much less of a concern here but the people behind it, because of the mind, the intent is of a criminal nature, the knowledge and technology will be used to commit the greatest evils ever.

We are at crossroads and if we do not understand that it is the monetization of Life and science that led us there in the first place… we are in DEEP troubles. If we want to address any threats, we first must change the way we look at things and Life.

Is Gene Editing the New Name for Eugenics?

A major new technology known as Gene Editing has gained significant attention in recent months. Its advocates claim it will revolutionize everything from agriculture production to disease treatment. None other than Bill Gates has just come out in an article in the US foreign policy magazine Foreign Affairs in praise of the promise of gene editing. Yet a closer investigation suggests that all is not so ideal with Gene Editing. New peer reviewed studies suggest it could cause cancer. The question is whether this technology, which is highly controversial, is little more than a stealth way to introduce GMO genetic manipulation by way of another technique…. MORE: 


Son of Frankenstein? UK Body Backs Human Embryo Gene Editing

Though the announcement is couched in terms that make it seem humanitarian, as potentially a huge advance in science, an agency tied to the British government is encouraging efforts in gene-editing of the DNA of human embryos. It belongs in the category of eugenics. Not surprisingly, the footprints of Bill Gates and the Rockefeller eugenics circles, and major pharma groups as well as GMO seed companies are found here. Following a well-placed article by Microsoft founder and major GMO supporter Bill Gates in the prestigious New York Council on Foreign Relations magazine, Foreign Affairs, strongly endorsing the development of so-called genetic editing, the UK’s Nuffield Council on Bioethics, a part Government-funded advisory body, has now released a report titled Genome Editing and Human Reproduction….

Also notable is the CEO and Director of the Francis Crick Institute, Sir Paul Nurse, geneticist and former President of the Rockefeller University in New York. In 2009 Nurse hosted an exclusive meeting at the Rockefeller University of hand-picked billionaires, invited by Bill Gates and David Rockefeller, to discuss the problem of “over-population.” They reportedly called their group The Good Club, and it included, according to reports, billionaire financiers Warren Buffett, George Soros and Michael Bloomberg….

The fact that today the same Sir Paul Nurse heads one of the world’s largest and best financed biomedical laboratories where they are doing gene editing of “donated” human embryos, suggests that a very dangerous agenda is being advanced under the banner of gene editing. And the fact that Bill Gates and his huge foundation, a major investor of Monsanto (now Bayer AG), have been funding experiments in gene editing for more than a decade, including CRISPR, suggests that gene editing could soon become a new name for human eugenics. MORE https://www.globalresearch.ca/son-of-frankenstein-uk-body-backs-human-embryo-gene-editing/5648338

Congress just put a massive roadblock in the way of genetically editing human embryos| Dec. 16, 2015

First of all, banning federal funding won’t stop efforts to edit human embryos, it’s just going to move them into private industry. “You’re not going to stop it, you’re just going to shift it into private hands and let the market regulate it,” Caplan told Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/congress-bans-funding-for-embryo-gene-editing-2015-12


Only Overcoming The “Psychosis Of Success” And A “Revolution Of Values” Can Free The Human Experience

To Break Free From Being Commodities We Must Prepare For An Extreme Human Experience

What You Were Not Told About “Self-Ownership” … And Should Know!

PS: if you feel like writing for The Earth Custodians Blog, we will consider any genuine inquiries with track records. (volunteering)

Until a critical mass is reached (30% of population) donations via patreon, to help spread the word, are welcome. https://www.patreon.com/earth_custodians_movement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *